top of page
On Requiem for a requiem...:
Our subjective perceives the world in discrete ‘instants’ of time that we understand as an overall continuous existence, the four-dimensional phenomenon of the self. It is when we realize that our previous set of values and definitions we imparted onto the world (the act of self-definition and the creation of essence) no longer works, and we are faced again with our existence (the universal human condition).
This realization propels the cycle of existentialism in that never ending pursuit for meaning in meaninglessness. We are forced to create ourselves (the first requiem) from nothingness in light of the previous instants (the previous requiems).
The individual instant is impossible to objectively define but can only be defined and understood as a lived experience in having confronted the absurd. We never know when we shift from one instant to the next, we can only realize that it has occurred in hindsight.
One must redefine all meaning from one instant to the next, otherwise they are trying to fit into a bygone ideal of themselves. As the situation one finds themselves in changes with the objective (a new location, state of mind, feeling, etc.) they are once confronted with their existence in a meaningless void where they are forced to redefine their meaning from.
Camus refers to this confrontation as the ‘Absurd’ in his philosophy. We find ourselves existing preceding any essence. All previous convictions toward life seem fake and like an aching memory that cannot be trusted. We see in front of us our existing within the raw objective meaninglessness of the world. We are alone. There is simply us and the boulder we are made to carry. Yet within that void we still feel a desire to keep going, an almost Karamazovian lust for living and meaning. With a sigh we continue pushing that boulder, no matter how tough or how much our muscles ache. In that moment we rebuild our sensibility amidst that meaninglessness, a new conviction to live. We continue to push, on and on, up the hill until we find ourselves suddenly at the bottom of the hill, face-to-face with the unrelenting silence of the world. So we continue on despite that and how each push and heave of the boulder will nevertheless send us back to the bottom of the hill. Each a reiteration of our rebellion to create meaning within the phenomenon of being:
a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem...
- Yixuan, 2026
"We cannot be sure of our memories and the changing states of the world reveal to us that our previous convictions toward life become just as absurd as the universe itself. Once again we realize our absurd existence and continue with the futile effort of finding meaning: the dedication of a requiem for a requiem for a requiem for a requiem… "
“Since God does not exist and man dies, everything is permissible. One experience is as good as another; the important thing is simply to acquire as many as possible. “The ideal of the absurd man is the present and the succession of present moments before an ever-conscious spirit” (Sisyphus). Confronted with this “quantitative ethic” all values collapse; thrown into this world, the absurd man, rebellious and irresponsible, has “nothing to justify.” He is innocent, innocent as Somerset Maugham’s savages before the arrival of clergyman who teaches them Good and Evil, what is lawful and what is forbidden. For this man, everything is lawful. He is as innocent as Prince Mishkin, who “lives in an everlasting present, lightly tinged with smiles and indifference.” Innocent in every sense of the word, he, too, is, if you like, an “Idiot.”” - Jean-Paul Sartre
bottom of page